Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 6:00 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 5:05 pm)Free Wrote: (December 22, 2014 at 5:03 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Wait. Two days in and you pull a Poe?
*Can't decide whether to be irritated or impressed*
Well ffs ... what kind of theist comes in here with "Theist Shithead" under his avatar, and a signature that says Jesus dicked Mary?
What, you've never seen a christian swear before?
The world's a big place and a lot of the people in it are christian; the odds of finding one with a dirty mind and a flair for self deprecation aren't that remote. Personally, I'd rather take people at their word when at all possible, especially when that might leave us with a theist who actually has a sense of humor about their religion, as opposed to the deadly serious conservative types we usually see.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 6:02 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 5:28 pm)Free Wrote: It was just an idea we had here at the office. "Go to an atheist site and pretend to be a theist just to see what life is like on the other side of the fence."
How original. Ok, now you've successfully trolled us, getting off to a great start in the process, how about introducing yourself properly in the intro section? Maybe we can put this unpleasantness behind us and start again.
(December 22, 2014 at 5:28 pm)Free Wrote: Certainly entertaining.
We're here to amuse.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 35379
Threads: 205
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 6:05 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 5:58 pm)Free Wrote: (December 22, 2014 at 5:49 pm)Beccs Wrote: I've never understood the need to troll/anonymously poe people.
I can pretend to be a theist quite well under my normal account without tying up the time of members/staff wondering if I'm real.
Yes, they'll know it's me, but we can have just as much fun, if not more fun knowing who and what I actually am.
Hey, I'm not the one who drives the crazy train backwards through traffic. I drive it full steam ahead, like a bull in a china shop.
The one time I did create a POE account on another forum, I told everyone in advance and we still had a lot of fun.
It was called the Sinister Minister on the old ST.com forums (now defunct because CBS suck!)
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 30992
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 6:21 pm
cc: in PM.
(December 22, 2014 at 3:14 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: (December 22, 2014 at 2:58 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I couldn't care less what feelings of persecution you may want us to think you have, H_M. This is the only standard that matters on this topic:
But please do keep it up. Our patience is not inexhaustible.
Exactly!! When you read a book, all of the chapters and subtopics are all on ONE topic...but they are all sectioned off to their own respective chapters because they are TOPICS within the TOPIC, and I would think that is a good enough justification to have them separate.
Admin hat on.
You are overruled. If you do as you suggest you intend to, the least that will happen is that the threads will be merged.
Your continued whining in discussion threads over the way this forum is being run is becoming disruptive.
If you want to continue posting here, you will cease that disruption in discussion threads.
If you have constructive criticism to how this forum is moderated, we have a subforum appropriate for that sort of post. This one is not it.
I assure you, this is absolutely the final word in the matter.
CD
AF.org Administrator
Posts: 98
Threads: 1
Joined: December 19, 2014
Reputation:
2
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 6:40 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2014 at 6:41 pm by Free.)
(December 22, 2014 at 6:00 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (December 22, 2014 at 5:05 pm)Free Wrote: Well ffs ... what kind of theist comes in here with "Theist Shithead" under his avatar, and a signature that says Jesus dicked Mary?
What, you've never seen a christian swear before?
The world's a big place and a lot of the people in it are christian; the odds of finding one with a dirty mind and a flair for self deprecation aren't that remote. Personally, I'd rather take people at their word when at all possible, especially when that might leave us with a theist who actually has a sense of humor about their religion, as opposed to the deadly serious conservative types we usually see.
Sure I have, but none that dropped the obvious hints that I did.
(December 22, 2014 at 6:02 pm)Stimbo Wrote: (December 22, 2014 at 5:28 pm)Free Wrote: It was just an idea we had here at the office. "Go to an atheist site and pretend to be a theist just to see what life is like on the other side of the fence."
How original. Ok, now you've successfully trolled us, getting off to a great start in the process, how about introducing yourself properly in the intro section? Maybe we can put this unpleasantness behind us and start again.
Done.
The beer's on you. I put it on your tab with the pizza.
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 6:56 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2014 at 6:58 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
Post edited in light of CD's post above. (December 22, 2014 at 2:06 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: (December 22, 2014 at 10:33 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: You can however get banned for being an arsehole.
Do atheists get banned for being assholes?
Yes, they have, often.
Posts: 35379
Threads: 205
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 6:58 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 6:56 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Post edited in light of CD's post above. (December 22, 2014 at 2:06 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: Do atheists get banned for being assholes?
Yes, they have, often.
Including, I seem to recall, financial contributors.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 7:09 pm
I amazed at the tolerance the mods have shown with that dickhead.
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 7:13 pm
(December 22, 2014 at 7:09 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I amazed at the tolerance the mods have shown with that dickhead.
But that's pretty much all he is. If dickhead qualifies for banning, there's a whole bunch of christers running for that title too.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 22, 2014 at 7:14 pm
He's spamming the board by posting the same shit time and again.
|