New fossil links humans and monkeys

[chatpilot]

The dinosaurs predated creation in the bible! Young Earth creationist believe the Earth is about 7.000 years old, the dinosaurs had already gone extinct. Where did the water come from? Jesus Christ Theo you surprise me don't you read your bible? Genesis 7:11,12
11.In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
12.And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.

God made all of the oceans of the deep flood and it rained for forty days and forty nights since God was hot and kind of pissed and decided to open the windows of heaven lol. There you have it folks "the truth".

[Minimalist]

It sounds so silly when you say it!

[chatpilot]

I know min just trying to keep the theists true to their bible stories.

[DiRNiS]

It goes beyond any type of scientific reason and logic, but it is the absolute TRUTH for them nonetheless.

[Minimalist]

I know min just trying to keep the theists true to their bible stories.

Some of them can't tolerate that.

[theophilus]

If you have questions about the flood you can probably find most of the answers here:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2

[downbeatplumb]

If you have questions about the flood you can probably find most of the answers here:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2

Seen it already its good for a laugh.

[chatpilot]

Anytime you go to Christian sites to read their versions of pseudoscience it is fun. It's like going on a roller coaster ride of illogical insanity.

[Minimalist]

If you have questions about the flood you can probably find most of the answers here:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2

Far superior than those holy jerkoffs you so adore.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-noahs-ark.html

Creationist models are often criticized for being too vague to have any predictive value. A literal interpretation of the Flood story in Genesis, however, does imply certain physical consequences which can be tested against what we actually observe, and the implications of such an interpretation are investigated below. Some creationists provided even more detailed models, and these are also addressed (see especially sections 5 and 7).

References are listed at the end of each section.

Two kinds of flood model are not addressed here. First is the local flood. Genesis 6-8 can be interpreted as a homiletic story such that the "world" that was flooded was just the area that Noah knew. Creationists argue against the local flood model because it doesn't fit their own literalist preconceptions, but I know of no physical evidence contrary to such a model.

Second, the whole story can be dismissed as a series of supernatural miracles. There is no way to contradict such an argument. However, one must wonder about a God who reportedly does one thing and then arranges every bit of evidence to make it look like something else happened. It's entirely possible that a global flood occurred 4000 years ago or even last Thursday, and that God subsequently erased all the evidence, including our memories of it. But even if such stories are true, what's the point?

[chatpilot]

Min you know the theists mantra right? If fact contradicts what we know through faith, then the facts are wrong!