Do you care about your significant others sexual past with a poll.

[paulpablo]

It's basically related to the two other threads already out there.

I vote yes because I care on several levels about my partners sexual history.

I care in the way I find a partners sexual past interesting for a start, I just want to know about it for the sake of knowing about it because quite often stories about past sexual experiences can be fascinating.  I care in the way that I think some sexual activities are unforgivable, and I care in the way that I'd probably give kudos to a girl for doing certain things anyway here's a rundown that goes into more specific things.

I care if they have been sexually abusive because I find that disgusting and unacceptable, it makes it more unforgivable if it involves children.

I care if they cheated a significant amount, I think some cheating is forgivable in certain situations but if they simply cheated all the time everytime then I'd find it difficult to trust them.

I care very little about the number of people they have had sex with, I think over 60 people and I'd probably be concnered about STDs.

I don't personally care about a girls previous relationships with other girls but from a straight womans perspective if I was a woman and the man seemed to be blatantly a repressed homosexual, say for example if I was a woman dating a guy who said he used to be gay until he discovered Jesus then I'd simply assume he was still gay and using me which I think is unacceptable.

I also care slightly about if a girl has ever been kinky in the past, it's not essential, but a girl definitely gets some kudos from me if she has experimented before.
This is really a tough one to think about, I do care about it because statistically if I look back at previous partners, the ones who had the most kinky history were the most exciting although I've had countless amounts of exciting times with girls without a history like that. 

[Alex K]

Options too simplistic and boring

[paulpablo]

Options too simplistic and boring

You have the option, other.  You could vote that and explain the nuances of your opinion.

[One Above All]

I don't care if my girlfriends/boyfriends have a sexual history with polls, no.

[Nope]

The poll would have been more clear if you used a word other than care. A person's sexual past is interesting but it isn't something that would bother me. The exception would be if the individual had lied or tricked someone into bed. Is the poll asking if my partner's sexual past upsets me ?

[Alex K]

I don't care if my girlfriends/boyfriends have a sexual history with polls, no.

How about with pollsters? I've heard they're pretty nasty.

[paulpablo]

The poll would have been more clear if you used a word other than care.  A person's sexual past is interesting but it isn't something that would bother me. The exception would be if the individual had lied or tricked someone into bed.  Is the poll asking if my partner's sexual past upsets me ?

This is the appropriate dictionary definition of care in regards to this topic.

Care
feel concern or interest; attach importance to something.

I would say that if something upsets you then it concerns you.  According to the definition you do care about your significant others sexual history if you find it interesting.
The wording of this thread isn't my original question. I'm basically copying off the exact same thread which asked the same question without a poll for 2 reasons.  It's better with a poll, and I don't understand how people can say they don't care about their partners sexual history.  It seems to be like it would be an innate concern.

[Nope]

The poll would have been more clear if you used a word other than care.  A person's sexual past is interesting but it isn't something that would bother me. The exception would be if the individual had lied or tricked someone into bed.  Is the poll asking if my partner's sexual past upsets me ?

This is the appropriate dictionary definition of care in regards to this topic.

Care
feel concern or interest; attach importance to something.

I would say that if something upsets you then it concerns you.  According to the definition you do care about your significant others sexual history if you find it interesting.
The wording of this thread isn't my original question. I'm basically copying off the exact same thread which asked the same question without a poll for 2 reasons.  It's better with a poll, and I don't understand how people can say they don't care about their partners sexual history.  It seems to be like it would be an innate concern.

I chose other because even the definition you used could be just a casual interest or a more negative concern. I know I am getting nitpicky but I just want to make certain I answered the question correctly

[paulpablo]

This is the appropriate dictionary definition of care in regards to this topic.
I would say that if something upsets you then it concerns you.  According to the definition you do care about your significant others sexual history if you find it interesting.
The wording of this thread isn't my original question. I'm basically copying off the exact same thread which asked the same question without a poll for 2 reasons.  It's better with a poll, and I don't understand how people can say they don't care about their partners sexual history.  It seems to be like it would be an innate concern.

I chose other because even the definition you used could be just a casual interest or a more negative concern. I know I am getting nitpicky but I just want to make certain I answered the question correctly

Well this doesn't make sense to me.  You said that if your previous partner had a history of tricking people into bed then it would concern you in a negative way.  You said you find your partners sexual history also to be something you find interesting.  You're concerned and interested about your partners sexual history yet you still didn't vote yes on this poll.

[robvalue]

I said no.