Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 26, 2015 at 11:24 am
These theists come on here looking for a certain reaction, and when they don't get it, it's got to be a let down, huh? Where's YGNinja?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 26, 2015 at 12:06 pm
(May 26, 2015 at 10:01 am)LostLocke Wrote: (May 23, 2015 at 11:54 am)YGninja Wrote: There has already been more fraud in the 'science of evolution', than all other sciences put together. Oh, no no no no no.... there is far more fraud in a ~6000 year old earth than there is in any other 'science'.
Considering the fact that not one branch of science points to the earth being ~6000 years old.
There isn't really that much fraud on the subject of evolution anyway; as I explained, with references, the last time YGNinja made this claim, all of the examples of fraud that he could find were frauds perpetrated against the scientific community, not by it, and were generally either distrusted by a scientific community that lacked the tools to properly verify the findings, or were dismissed by the scientific community and made popular by either laymen or single scientists going against the usual standards of reportage and peer review by publishing their work in popular magazines instead. In all cases, the frauds were found out and exposed by scientists who accept evolution and not creationists, and in all cases the scientific community is on record as having major doubts about the veracity of the frauds; it is only the creationists, desperate to find anything to smear evolution, who see fit to spin these examples of the scientific method working perfectly into intentional deceit by science, when in actual fact it's anything but.
So, creationists lie, and so is YGNinja, when he makes that claim. If your arguments don't change after they've been shown to be factually incorrect, that's a lie. YGNinja is a liar.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 26, 2015 at 12:19 pm
Why do you lie, YGNinja?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 26, 2015 at 12:24 pm
He gone.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 2962
Threads: 44
Joined: March 22, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 26, 2015 at 12:25 pm
(May 26, 2015 at 12:19 pm)Alex K Wrote: Why do you lie, YGNinja?
The Devil has His Claws wrapped around YGNinja's heart.
The Devil is the Father of Lies after all. And the mother of hearts.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 26, 2015 at 12:52 pm
And the Ace of Spades.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 26, 2015 at 1:00 pm
I'd say the cards predict a troubled future for him.
![[Image: 1896klpb89f10png.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.kinja-img.com%2Fgawker-media%2Fimage%2Fupload%2Fs--vHUgEIIM--%2F1896klpb89f10png.png)
![[Image: giger21.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.johncoulthart.com%2Ffeuilleton%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2012%2F12%2Fgiger21.jpg)
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 7318
Threads: 75
Joined: April 18, 2015
Reputation:
73
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 26, 2015 at 1:09 pm
Ooh much Giger, such pretty
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 27, 2015 at 10:51 am
Giger tarot cards, no less. Quite an interesting concept.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Peer reviewed study published in Science Journal turns out to be fraud.
May 27, 2015 at 3:21 pm
Seeing these threads is so frustrating sometimes, as if one little thing like this is suddenly touted as the silver bullet that kills off the entirety of science as a field and discipline.
I know it will be hard for the OP to understand this, but really this is just further evidence of how the scientific method can help eliminate bias and fraud. Is it perfect? Nope, but then again nobody has ever claimed it is.
Duplication of results is one of the key benchmarks of a data's validity. The fact that people tried to replicate the data and failed is just an example of the system actually working and being effective and rooting out deceit.
But whatever. I couldn't really care less about what someone so illiterate in reality thinks about something far beyond his comprehension.
|
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
