Posts: 9479
Threads: 116
Joined: July 5, 2015
Reputation:
23
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:21 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 3:16 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 3:05 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I'm sorry you seem to think so. I think, what she did was unforgiveable.
Don't act like she killed your cat. It was hardly anything close to unforgiveable.
And get help. The ego in that sentence is tripping my alarms hard.
You can't tell me what is unforgiveable for me and what not as this is rather subjective.
What ego?
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:22 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 3:05 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 2:58 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: Jesus ep. You really are an asshole. The only thing uncalled for here was you calling CL a crazy bitch. Get over yourself -_-
I'm sorry you seem to think so. I think, what she did was unforgiveable. After I was reluctant to expound on my views at first, she first misquoted me, then put words in my mouth and tried to persuade me to answer in this manner. It's all there to see. When I finally did answer here she just dismissed my answers completely. Fuck that. If you can't accept people's opinions don't ask for them.
I mean really this ?!
A asks B: Tell me what you think:
B says to A: I think so.
A says to B: your opinion doesn't matter.
I have rewritten my questions for you in my post 169 (right above). I have carefully reviewed what I wrote and am quite certain that I did not misquote you or put words in your mouth this second time around.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 7318
Threads: 75
Joined: April 18, 2015
Reputation:
73
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:26 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 3:21 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 3:16 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: Don't act like she killed your cat. It was hardly anything close to unforgiveable.
And get help. The ego in that sentence is tripping my alarms hard.
You can't tell me what is unforgiveable for me and what not as this is rather subjective.
What ego?
The one that's telling you that someone saying your opinions don't matter is unforgiveable. And the same one you've been displaying most of your time here. Like calling people bitches over nothing.
I'm serious. That's not a good sign.
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:26 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 3:19 pm)Minimalist Wrote: ............
Mini, do you have a facebook account? I'd like to be friends with you on facebook, if you will have me.
If so, just let me know and I will send you a PM with my information so you can add me.
If not, I totally understand. Let me know!
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 9479
Threads: 116
Joined: July 5, 2015
Reputation:
23
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:30 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2015 at 3:37 pm by Excited Penguin.)
(July 10, 2015 at 3:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: 1. So if you definitively do not think the scenario presented above (stable home, 2 parents) is the ideal scenario, then what do you think would be a better scenario?
2. You then said there might be far better ways to raise children than in a stable home with 2 parents. What are your ideas/theories on what ways might be far better? 1. I don't have any idea.
2. I have none.
At least for now.
Catholic_Lady Wrote:Can you elaborate on how the government should go about dictating the number of children being born, and how the government would reinforce this law? I don't know. I am not a statesmen nor am I an expert in the matter. You would have to ask one.
You're welcome!
(July 10, 2015 at 3:26 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: The one that's telling you that someone saying your opinions don't matter is unforgiveable. And the same one you've been displaying most of your time here. Like calling people bitches over nothing.
I'm serious. That's not a good sign.
This is the first time I've done this. Please don't be dishonest.
You're ignoring the context of what happened, when I clearly provided it to you and you may go and check what I said. I will repeat myself. She asked my opinion on something while misquoting what I actually said and then putting words in my mouth which I never actually said. She tried to make me sound as though I said something else than what I really said. Then she kept pressuring me until I expounded on my initial views. Opon my doing that she dismissed my opinions altogether. I think this is unforgiveable. If you think not, then I'll keep it in mind and do the same thing to you, just so you can see what it's like, deal?
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:34 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2015 at 3:38 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(July 10, 2015 at 3:30 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 3:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Ok, so here, you are answering my question with a definitive "No." Meaning you definitively do not think that as a general rule it's better for society if children are raised in a stable home with both parents (as opposed to a non stable home with 2 parents, or a stable home with 1 parent, or any other scenario).
1. So if you definitively do not think the scenario presented above (stable home, 2 parents) is the ideal scenario, then what do you think would be a better scenario?
2. You then said there might be far better ways to raise children than in a stable home with 2 parents. What are your ideas/theories on what ways might be far better?
(I have numbered these to show that they are two separate questions addressing your two sentences. If you could answer them both, that would greatly help me understand your views. Thank you.)
1. I don't have any idea.
2. I have none.
At least for now.
This should be a lot more straight forward.
You are saying you believe the number of children people are allowed to have should be controlled, and that this should be done by restricting the number of children allowed to be born.
Can you elaborate on how the government should go about dictating the number of children being born, and how the government would reinforce this law?
Thanks so much!
I don't know. I am not a statesmen nor an expert in the matter. You would have to ask one.
You're welcome!
Fair enough, thanks!
(July 10, 2015 at 3:30 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: This is the first time I've done this. Please don't be dishonest.
You're ignoring the context of what happened, when I clearly provided it to you and you may go and check what I said. I will repeat myself. She asked my opinion on something while misquoting what I actually said and then putting words in my mouth which I never actually said. She tried to make me sound as though I said something else than what I really said. Then she kept pressuring me until I expounded on my initial views. Opon my doing that she dismissed my opinions altogether. I think this is unforgiveable. If you think not, then I'll keep it in mind and do the same thing to you, just so you can see what it's like, deal?
I understand if you don't want to forgive me, but I do hope you believe me when I say that I did not "put words in your mouth" or "misquote you" on purpose. I had simply misunderstood what you had said and was asking for further clarification, as needed.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 9479
Threads: 116
Joined: July 5, 2015
Reputation:
23
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:42 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2015 at 3:43 pm by Excited Penguin.)
(July 10, 2015 at 3:34 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I understand if you don't want to forgive me, but I do hope you believe me when I say that I did not "put words in your mouth" or "misquote you" on purpose. I had simply misunderstood what you had said and was asking for further clarification, as needed.
It's not that I don't want to forgive you, but I don't believe in the concept of forgiving. It's useless and redundant. You did wrong by me, whether you know it or not. I can't be sure if you're lying or not. I was quite clear on what I was saying using words like "might be" and you translated those in " are/is", for example. Go check.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:44 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 3:26 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 3:19 pm)Minimalist Wrote: ............
Mini, do you have a facebook account? I'd like to be friends with you on facebook, if you will have me.
If so, just let me know and I will send you a PM with my information so you can add me.
If not, I totally understand. Let me know!
The only thing I despise more than religion is Facebook. They both do approximately the same amount of harm but FB is growing and religion is shrinking.
Posts: 9479
Threads: 116
Joined: July 5, 2015
Reputation:
23
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:45 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 3:44 pm)Minimalist Wrote: The only thing I despise more than religion is Facebook. They both do approximately the same amount of harm but FB is growing and religion is shrinking.
How come?
I agree, but I'm just curious as to why you're hostile towards them.
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
July 10, 2015 at 3:48 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2015 at 3:49 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(July 10, 2015 at 3:42 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 3:34 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I understand if you don't want to forgive me, but I do hope you believe me when I say that I did not "put words in your mouth" or "misquote you" on purpose. I had simply misunderstood what you had said and was asking for further clarification, as needed.
It's not that I don't want to forgive you, but I don't believe in the concept of forgiving. It's useless and redundant. You did wrong by me, whether you know it or not. I can't be sure if you're lying or not. I was quite clear on what I was saying using words like "might be" and you translated those in " are/is", for example. Go check.
Fair enough.
(July 10, 2015 at 3:44 pm)Minimalist Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 3:26 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Mini, do you have a facebook account? I'd like to be friends with you on facebook, if you will have me.
If so, just let me know and I will send you a PM with my information so you can add me.
If not, I totally understand. Let me know!
The only thing I despise more than religion is Facebook.
Haha, ok then.
..But, I will just say that you are missing out on being my facebook friend. Your loss!
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
|