Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 9, 2016 at 10:35 am
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2016 at 10:36 am by Alex K.)
(January 9, 2016 at 9:00 am)LastPoet Wrote: Encheu o saco. See, I know Brazilian too In German, the barrel overflows or alternatively, your nose is full.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 9, 2016 at 11:47 am
It's an important distinction.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 12:31 am
Steel, you the man!
Quote:We have shown Delicate the door for consistent trolling/flaming.  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 12:40 am
Is this a temp ban or is it a permanent one?
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 12:56 am
Delicate is gone, FSM will is done. May blessings of Noodles will be delivered to you.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
Conservative trigger warning.
![[Image: s-l640.jpg]](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DjAAAOSwpIhe1HCM/s-l640.jpg)  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 1:11 am
No loss there.
 RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 1:22 am
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2016 at 1:26 am by SteelCurtain.)
(January 16, 2016 at 12:40 am)Judi Lynn Wrote: Is this a temp ban or is it a permanent one? It is permanent. (January 16, 2016 at 12:31 am)Whateverist the White Wrote: Steel, you the man! 'Tis true. But this were a team effort.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---  RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 1:36 am
Hi Steel, sorry if it was addressed already, but I saw that Delicate was banned for trolling. What constitutes as trolling in this case? How was he trolling?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 16, 2016 at 1:45 am
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2016 at 1:46 am by SteelCurtain.)
(January 16, 2016 at 1:36 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Hi Steel, sorry if it was addressed already, but I saw that Delicate was banned for trolling. What constitutes as trolling in this case? How was he trolling? I direct you to the last couple of pages of this thread, with a reminder that he has already had multiple run ins with staff.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
