Bible way to Heaven

[Randys brother]

Just wondering what everyone else is giving this guy out of 10 for his trolling attempt?

Maybe a 1? A 2? I like the user name and the bee avatar, but the posts are pretty shit. Not enough U mad bro IMHO or attempts to flame. the constant use of the 'fool' is pretty amateurish tbh.

According to God a fool is a person who doesn't believe in him and that's you,yes you now go ahead and ban me I don't care.

[TheRocketSurgeon]

@Randys brother (or as I'll hereafter refer to you, Poe): Your "evidence" for the untrustworthiness of radiocarbon dating is an amateurish cartoon clip in which radiocarbon dating is not mentioned once?!? As for the actual content of the video, why don't you do a little research? I'm sure, if you're honest, you'll soon enough discover the Mack truck-size holes in the presentation.

And if you're not honest about it, you will only (1) confirm my dim view of what passes for Christian honesty, or (2) confirm to me that you are a Poe.

I don't trust carbon dating,and that's there might be evidence for it,but I assume there still too weak and so I totally reject the idea.

---

Yeah, I have to agree with you on that. When I see someone posting stuff that's that blatantly  dishonest about the subject, I can no longer take them seriously enough to waste my time interacting with them.

1. Liar
2. Poe
3. Accepts that the USGS is not insane, and that there's a rational basis for radioisometric dating.

I also agree that if the dating methods were used to confirm that a piece of wood was Jesus's cross (or somesuch), they'd be all about it.

Your the real liar,didn't you lie before?

Did you miss where I admitted my mistake, and said I was wrong about Patheos, or do you think that a mistake makes me a liar?

In fact, it's your inability to FIX YOUR MISTAKES when they're pointed out to you that makes me call you a liar, here.

[Crossless2.0]

@Randys brother (or as I'll hereafter refer to you, Poe): Your "evidence" for the untrustworthiness of radiocarbon dating is an amateurish cartoon clip in which radiocarbon dating is not mentioned once?!? As for the actual content of the video, why don't you do a little research? I'm sure, if you're honest, you'll soon enough discover the Mack truck-size holes in the presentation.

And if you're not honest about it, you will only (1) confirm my dim view of what passes for Christian honesty, or (2) confirm to me that you are a Poe.

I don't trust carbon dating,and that's there might be evidence for it,but I assume there still too weak and so I totally reject the idea.

---

Yeah, I have to agree with you on that. When I see someone posting stuff that's that blatantly  dishonest about the subject, I can no longer take them seriously enough to waste my time interacting with them.

1. Liar
2. Poe
3. Accepts that the USGS is not insane, and that there's a rational basis for radioisometric dating.

I also agree that if the dating methods were used to confirm that a piece of wood was Jesus's cross (or somesuch), they'd be all about it.

Your the real liar,didn't you lie before?

To recap, Poe doesn't believe in a well understood and, among actual scientists, unanimously accepted method of reliably dating artifacts of a certain age within tolerable limits of error; does believe in the utterly unsupported magical claims found strewn throughout the Bible.

I really do hope you're a Poe and just yanking our chains. To think that you could be this fucking stupid for real is too depressing to consider.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Just wondering what everyone else is giving this guy out of 10 for his trolling attempt?

Maybe a 1? A 2? I like the user name and the bee avatar, but the posts are pretty shit. Not enough U mad bro IMHO or attempts to flame. the constant use of the 'fool' is pretty amateurish tbh.

According to God a fool is a person who doesn't believe in him and that's you,yes you now go ahead and ban me I don't care.

You see, look at this chump? Again using the word fool in lieu of having anything else to flame with. What a fucking noob. There are 8 year olds who have bated here better than this.

this soppy bollocks' trolling game is weak. 2 out of 10 for the avatar and the user handle. Points deducted for poor evasion and poor trolling knowledge and discourse.

[drfuzzy]

Why does atheism exist?

• Atheism exist's because of people's pride.
  
• So that have obey God's rules.
  
• So that they don't have obey there Father and Mother.
  
• So that they can watch Porn.
  
• So that can show that there cool.
  

Well, you certainly showed your lack of pride in that post that's so misspelled and horribly punctuated that it would make an intelligent 10-yr-old's eyes bleed.  Good job.  You're obviously not prideful.  (Except for the fact that you seem to believe you should be allowed to tell whole groups of people that they are stupid and deluded.  Gawd must be so proud of you.

Atheism exists because there is no gawd, and there is no evidence of gawd.  
You either got the rest out of a Chick Tract, a demented radio preacher, some 1960's sunday school drivel . . . who cares.
You're still coming into OUR house trying to tell us what we believe, what we think, how we're so terribly wrong, over and over and over.
You might say you'll tell us a million times.  It's a total waste of your time.  

Your gawd is an imaginary psychopathic sadistic monster.  Your wholly babble is a pile of pig shit.

[Crossless2.0]

Yeah, I have to agree with you on that. When I see someone posting stuff that's that blatantly  dishonest about the subject, I can no longer take them seriously enough to waste my time interacting with them.

1. Liar
2. Poe
3. Accepts that the USGS is not insane, and that there's a rational basis for radioisometric dating.

I also agree that if the dating methods were used to confirm that a piece of wood was Jesus's cross (or somesuch), they'd be all about it.

I'm surprised you guys are drawing this conclusion from your attempt to discourse reasonably with him (I'm actually really surprised at what you've managed to get him to say) and not from the fact that he is quite obviously a troll.

I took a while to come around because I suspected at first that he was Randy and had just changed his M.O. slightly and dumbed down his grammar to escape immediate detection.

[Reforged]

Around a quarter do. 
Isn't that something you should know?

no need to know the percent of southern Baptists who are kjv bible believing Christians

You're a KJV Christian attempting to debate atheists over the prospect that your vision of reality is the correct one.
This is an incredible difficult, if not impossible, position to defend.
Its important to know who already agrees with you and what their views are on the matter.

[Nay_Sayer]

Did a very poor job of it too.

---

The Bible was given to us by the Holy Spirit as discerned by the early bishops of the Catholic Church. There was no Bible for the first 350 years of Christianity. The first official list of Scriptures was done in 393 at the Council of Hippo, then again in Carthage in 397 and 419. The Church did not infallibly define these books until the Council of Trent, when it was called into question by the Reformers, in 1556.
Partial criteria for determining the canon is as follows:

• special relation to God, i.e., inspiration;
  
  
• apostolic origin;
  
  
• used in Church services, i.e., used by the community of believers guided by the Holy Spirit.
  

There were two different forms of the ancient Scriptures in use, the Septuagint and the Masoretic texts. The Septuagint has its influence from the Greek Jews in the Diaspora (outside Israel) whereas the Masoretic text was used by the Jews still in Jerusalem.
The Church has always used the  as its base for the Old Testament. The Septuagint has a few more books than the later established Masoretic texts. In fact, the Masoretic canon was set by the Jews after the Christians accepted the Septuagint version as their Scripture. This makes sense considering the non-messianic Jews were not too crazy about Jesus so why would they accept the same books as the Christians?

Source :http://www.aboutcatholics.com/beliefs/how-was-the-bible-written-and-created/

---

The Book of Pasta was given to us by the Holy Spaghetti as discerned by the early apostles of the Pastafarian Church. There was no Book Of Pasta for the first 260 years of Pastafarianism.
 
The Church has always used the Spaghetti as its base for the Old Tortellini. The Spaghetti's 1 has a few more books than the later established Meatball texts.

RAmen.

[robvalue]

1/10, I think this is probably Randy on someone else's computer putting on a weird act.

[drfuzzy]

I don't trust carbon dating,and that's there might be evidence for it,but I assume there still too weak and so I totally reject the idea.

---

Your the real liar,didn't you lie before?

Did you miss where I admitted my mistake, and said I was wrong about Patheos, or do you think that a mistake makes me a liar?

In fact, it's your inability to FIX YOUR MISTAKES when they're pointed out to you that makes me call you a liar, here.

This idiot ignores anything that doesn't come out of the wholly babble, that monstrous book of sick moronic fairy tales he worships so slavishly.  He pulls a few things from fundamentalist sources sometimes, which are notorious for twisting facts to match their wholly babble.  Occasionally he will add something that he took from a Chick tract or twisted up in his head.   But he's essentially stayed on the same stupid message that we all have rejected for decades:  "believe ______  chapter and verse or you'll go to hell".   (yawn)    We tell him that his chapters and verses have less meaning to us than Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series, but he doesn't seem to be capable of understanding.  He probably thinks that his magic book verses will abracadabra us into believing if he just drops enough of 'em on us.