RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 22, 2015 at 10:45 pm
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2015 at 10:46 pm by Randy Carson.)
(July 22, 2015 at 10:14 pm)Easy Guns Wrote:(July 22, 2015 at 7:36 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: You have nothing and the longer you go on, the more apparent it becomes that you will not because you cannot refute these five facts.
Oh fucking shit Randy.
IT DOESNT MATTER. NOBODY NEEDS TO DISPROVE YOUR FACTS.
Even IF they're all true, that doesn't prove that anyone was resurrected.
What in the fuck don't you understand about that? Someone believing it happened and writing about it isn't fucking proof.
Your "minimal facts approach" FAILED. Get over it and move on already.
Fucking hell.
What don't I understand?
Well, let's see...
![[Image: hmmm.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=forums.catholic.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fani%2Fhmmm.gif)
We have evidence that a guy named Jesus who lived 2,000 ago claimed to be God.
And that He predicted that he would die and rise again.
And that some people seemed to think that He pulled it off.
Now, if that is true - the rising again part, that is - then it suggests that maybe He was who He claimed to be and that the rest of what He said might be important. Especially if He's, you know, God.
Not saying for sure...not committing to anything just yet...but it's probably worth looking into.
So, what I don't understand is indifference and willful ignorance.