Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach

[robvalue]

So we're still on the argument from ignorance.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Please follow this link and try and understand it. That goes for anyone who thinks Randy is making any valid points here.

I don't know how many more times I can say this... please learn what logical fallacies are. You're making a fool of yourself, and continuing to act superior while repeating the same mistake over and over. This shit may confuse others with little grounding in logic, but not us.

This is like playing chess against someone who just picks up their queen on their first move, and just smashes it onto the opponent's king, declaring victory. In their mind, they have won and we can't possibly defend ourselves. To us, it's a child who refuses to learn the rules. Logic has rules. And they are not atheist rules, or theist rules.

If you don't follow the rules, you can "prove" anything.