(July 25, 2015 at 9:56 am)Randy Carson Wrote:(July 25, 2015 at 8:52 am)robvalue Wrote: So you respond to the accusation that you're conflating historical and magic Jesus by doing the exact same thing again and adding an appeal to authority fallacy. Historians are not an authority on supernatural events. No one is. That is the problem.
You just don't care about integrity at all, do you?
That's crap and you know it.
NO ONE and I mean NO ONE has posted more sourced material than I have. The majority of the posts in this thread have come from empty-headed individuals such as yourself simply popping off anything and everything that comes to mind on the spur of the moment. You are easily among the worst offenders in this regard.
Your posts are emotional and not rational.
Thanks for the part that involves me... -.-'
Care to tell us all what Ehrman claims can be extracted from the gospels as historical?
And why is it that, even given those historical bits, he refuses to acknowledge that the resurrection story is an account of reality?