RE: Has Science done away with a need for God?
July 27, 2015 at 11:33 am
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2015 at 11:41 am by robvalue.)
There was never any need for a god, it doesn't explain anything. It is the personification of the argument from ignorance/incredulity.
If you can even define what a god is, and how I can distinguish it from a non God, I'll be impressed
Science does not comment on "the supernatural". If God is defined to be outside the scope of the natural, then science has no interest in it. Science deals with what is real and testable, that's all.
Choose? I don't even know what "choosing God" means. If you choose it as an explanation then you've abandoned science at that point and are just making up answers to feel comfortable.
If you can even define what a god is, and how I can distinguish it from a non God, I'll be impressed

Science does not comment on "the supernatural". If God is defined to be outside the scope of the natural, then science has no interest in it. Science deals with what is real and testable, that's all.
Choose? I don't even know what "choosing God" means. If you choose it as an explanation then you've abandoned science at that point and are just making up answers to feel comfortable.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum