RE: A few points of conflict with Jackie L's (Eilonnwy) article.
October 24, 2010 at 8:43 am
(This post was last modified: October 24, 2010 at 9:00 am by Dotard.)
The article is just more of Eilo's misandrist bullshit.
To argue with her about it is like argueing with a theist about their religion. They just want to believe it to be real in order to come to terms with their lot in life. In order to shift blame to another for "holding them down". A man with much greater power, prestige, whatever must have gotten what he has by some perceived priviledges granted by (or forced from) society.
Yeah, Eilo, white men are rulerz of the universe if that makes you feel better about yourself.
To argue with her about it is like argueing with a theist about their religion. They just want to believe it to be real in order to come to terms with their lot in life. In order to shift blame to another for "holding them down". A man with much greater power, prestige, whatever must have gotten what he has by some perceived priviledges granted by (or forced from) society.
Yeah, Eilo, white men are rulerz of the universe if that makes you feel better about yourself.
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
![[Image: attemptingtogiveadamnc.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img824.imageshack.us%2Fimg824%2F7042%2Fattemptingtogiveadamnc.gif)
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
