RE: A few points of conflict with Jackie L's (Eilonnwy) article.
October 28, 2010 at 7:41 am
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2010 at 7:50 am by fr0d0.)
Are you being unbiased and neutral now Tav? Looks like you're still attacking. I'm sure the females are trembling in awe. Good job
@ Adrian: It's a statistical fact that women are a lower risk, and simply deducible with common sense. You think business would offer different rates if this were not so?!?
I'm astounded at the lengths you're prepared to go to to hide your head in the sand
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14522664
http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/jsp/content/Na...pageID=191.
@ Adrian: It's a statistical fact that women are a lower risk, and simply deducible with common sense. You think business would offer different rates if this were not so?!?
I'm astounded at the lengths you're prepared to go to to hide your head in the sand
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14522664
http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/jsp/content/Na...pageID=191.