(November 3, 2010 at 12:37 pm)Jaysyn Wrote: Peer Review is the difference between science a some moron ranting on the Internet.This is the start of article you linked to:
Quote:Peer review is a generic term that is used to describe a process of self-regulation by a profession or a process of evaluation involving qualified individuals with the related field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards, improve performance, and provide credibility. In academia, the term is often used to denote a prepublication reviews of academic papers; reviewing an academic paper is often called refereeing.I would like to consider this phrase,
Quote:a process of evaluation involving qualified individuals with the related field.Who determines which individuals are qualified? In the case of evolution, peer reviews are normally conducted by people who are committed to the belief that evolution is true so naturally they aren't likely to be impartial when evaluating the work of those who don't believe in it.
His invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.
Romans 1:20 ESV
Romans 1:20 ESV
