(September 3, 2015 at 10:03 am)Napoléon Wrote:(September 3, 2015 at 9:44 am)Cato Wrote: I think there's a bit of superficial reasoning involved with this conclusion. It's similar to one arguing that gang violence is strictly because of a blind fealty for the colors/creed of the gang and has nothing to do with socioeconomic factors.
Um, I never discounted other factors or said it was strictly because of one thing. Shuffle might be arguing that but I'm not.
I'm just saying there is such a thing as Islamic terrorism and it is quite prevalent. That should be the crux of the issue. It is for me at least.
You ask where to draw the line between religiously motivated and religiously. My point is, the line is obviously blurred in many countries, and in effect it's both. Not either/or.
Exactly, it doesn't matter why the muslims are doing it, it just matters that they are doing it, and they are doing it at an exaggerated degree more compared to the other major faiths.