Not all Muslims are Terrorists!

[Shuffle]

Um, no. You are wrong I have given this link out 2 other times, and each time I do, the people ignore it and don't post back.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_te...ents,_2015

At the very top of that page is this disclaimer:

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (August 2015)

How in the world do you expect to have credibility when you cite a source so shaky that it admits it before you've read the first word? Did you not see that disclaimer? Or -- and this is my suspicion -- you saw it and kept on reading, and once you discovered that the data supported your bias, you decided that the obvious concerns that the editors there have were unfounded?

Sorry, I want impartial data, not cooked books.

Here's what I've found, for America:

This listing by the FBI of attacks going back to 1980 clearly demonstrates that less than 99% of all terrorist attacks in America were committed by Muslims. You'll notice that I went directly to a source which is required by law to collate ALL these statistics.

According to Global Research:

Terrorism Is a Real Threat … But the Threat to the U.S. from Muslim Terrorists Has Been Exaggerated

An FBI report shows that only a small percentage of terrorist attacks carried out on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 were perpetrated by Muslims.

Princeton University’s Loon Watch compiled the following chart from the FBI’s data:



According to this data, there were more Jewish acts of terrorism within the United States than Islamic (7% vs 6%).  These radical Jews committed acts of terrorism in the name of their religion.  These were not terrorists who happened to be Jews; rather, they were extremist Jews who committed acts of terrorism based on their religious passions, just like Al-Qaeda and company.

(Loon Watch also notes that less than 1% of terror attacks in Europe were carried out by Muslims.)

You can read the entire article here.

So on the one hand we have a government source legally bound to collate all the data on these incidents, and on the other we have you waving around a wiki article that is disputed by its own authors. Forgive me for thinking that your argument is horseshit ... but it is.

Ok, sorry. Would you like to peruse this website? http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html

Or this one? http://www.jihadwatch.org/

I can keep linking websites until we find one that you like.

And that pie chart is hilarious! First off, I said DEATHS, not attacks. Secondly, why the fuck is it in America?! Muslims make up 0.2% of America's population. 0.2% is responsible for 6% of terrorist attacks. How is that reasonable?