Not all Muslims are Terrorists!

[Thumpalumpacus]

At the very top of that page is this disclaimer:


How in the world do you expect to have credibility when you cite a source so shaky that it admits it before you've read the first word? Did you not see that disclaimer? Or -- and this is my suspicion -- you saw it and kept on reading, and once you discovered that the data supported your bias, you decided that the obvious concerns that the editors there have were unfounded?

Sorry, I want impartial data, not cooked books.

Here's what I've found, for America:

This listing by the FBI of attacks going back to 1980 clearly demonstrates that less than 99% of all terrorist attacks in America were committed by Muslims. You'll notice that I went directly to a source which is required by law to collate ALL these statistics.

According to Global Research:


You can read the entire article here.

So on the one hand we have a government source legally bound to collate all the data on these incidents, and on the other we have you waving around a wiki article that is disputed by its own authors. Forgive me for thinking that your argument is horseshit ... but it is.

Ok, sorry. Would you like to peruse this website? http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html

Or this one? http://www.jihadwatch.org/

I can keep linking websites until we find one that you like.

And that pie chart is hilarious! First off, I said DEATHS, not attacks. Secondly, why the fuck is it in America?! Muslims make up 0.2% of America's population. 0.2% is responsible for 6% of terrorist attacks. How is that reasonable?

Firstly, biased sites aren't trustworthy.

Secondly, nowhere did I say that any of those attacks, no matter who perpetrated them, were "reasonable".

Give me unbiased sources, and read what I write and reply to that. I'm not going to bandy words with anyone who wishes to be disingenuous.