(September 14, 2015 at 6:38 pm)Napoléon Wrote:(September 14, 2015 at 5:40 pm)MTL Wrote: It is frowned upon ONLY because we have made breasts more primarily sexual things,
than for feeding infants.
I'm going to echo Miley Cyrus on this one, it's fucking stupid how this works.
In virtually all forms of media it's perfectly okay to show side-boob, under-boob, cleavage, basically everywhere around the tit but the nipple. As long as we can't see the nipple. But we can show as many men's nipples as we like.
So the actual defining difference between men and women's chests are easily viewable but the thing we all have is okay for guys but not for girls.
It makes zero sense.
But uh, as for breastfeeding, I couldn't give a toss.
This is what really pisses me off about it. The double standards.
You see pictures everywhere of scantily clad chicks, flashing everything but their nipples and it's sexy. The moment nipples make an appearance, especially for the purpose for which they evolved, it's a bloody scandal
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"