I agree with all of that.
I have just been saying that Jesus is not and very probably CANNOT be disproved 100%.
You cannot prove his non-existence because that's the fallacy of 'negative proof'.
Just as the FSM and IPU, despite the fact they are completely unplausibable and extremely improbable - they are just that: extremely improbable. They are not disproved. To claim that they are or that Jesus is, would be a the fallacy of 'negative proof'.
In other words, you cannot, by any known means, prove a negative.
I have just been saying that Jesus is not and very probably CANNOT be disproved 100%.
You cannot prove his non-existence because that's the fallacy of 'negative proof'.
Just as the FSM and IPU, despite the fact they are completely unplausibable and extremely improbable - they are just that: extremely improbable. They are not disproved. To claim that they are or that Jesus is, would be a the fallacy of 'negative proof'.
In other words, you cannot, by any known means, prove a negative.