Help Me Understand, part duex

[Wyrd of Gawd]

---

Why do you keep saying this?

Do you not know how genetics works? Seriously. Look it up.

When you can explain to me how endogenous retroviruses are fixed into germ lines, and what that means, then you can tell me why it's not (by itself!) absolute proof of evolution. After that we can get to the dozens of other independent lines of proof of evolution.

Pro Tip: Plugging your ears and covering your eyes and shouting "la la la la la!" is not the same thing as disproving evolution.

---

I just wanted to re-post this "for the record", since it's the clearest possible proof I could offer that you have no idea what evolution is, what it does, or what the evidence to verify it is, even in the slightest fraction.

I mean, damn, GC.  Trying reading a book!

---

 I understand you want to call adaptable change within a species, evolution, it's only adaptation. You have and never will see one species change into another. Your right I'm not a scientist, why I surrounded myself with them to learn. I do read books in areas that interest me, I've enjoyed five Charles Dickens novels this year and probably will read another by the end of the year. Until you observe one species change to another you will have never seen evolution.

GC

So, you believe in talking snakes and talking donkeys, 969 year-old men, a world-wide flood that covered the highest mountain, ghost, spirits, demons, angels, resurrections, eternal life in heaven and hell, a virgin birth, and a ton of other religious BS but you will absolutely draw the line at evolution!  Evolution is simply too unreasonable to even be considered as a possible scientific fact.  

OK.