(September 29, 2015 at 10:53 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: [quote='Little Rik' pid='1066490' dateline='1443536020']
So you reckon that doctors that declare a bloke dead are not capable of knowing for sure whether the bloke is alive or dead?
What a waste plumb.
These doctors study for years and years for nothing.
They should come to your school and learn the profession.
By the way what are your qualification?
Since you appear to have missed it, the first time, I'm going to quote myself here:
(September 28, 2015 at 1:09 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: I suppose we should pause a moment to scientifically consider your NDE claims.
Thankfully, the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) has already done so:
Is There Evidence for an Afterlife?
http://www.csicop.org/sb/show/is_there_e..._afterlife
NDE Experiment: Ethical Concerns (a review of "studies" of the NDEs reported in hospitals)
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/nde_experi..._concerns/
If you want to learn about your brain's architecture and why humans tend to believe silly things, read The Belief Engine.
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/belief_engine
And many more such articles!
I know you don't actually care to investigate the truth of how our brains create fabrications like NDEs (and religion!), and won't read any of that. I've come to expect it. But since you came here calling us unscientific and claiming we just need to look to see the truth, I'm pointing out to you that we have looked, scientifically, and found the concepts lacking. You should try science and reason. They're often quite refreshing.
Oh, you have looked, scientifically.................but wait a moment mate, this just remind me of that guy that instead of calling a plumber to fix his toilet called an electrician.
How the hell can physical science be able to investigate something outside his competence as the consciousness?
You guys are totally stuck in the dogma that physical science is the panacea for all problems.