who created christianity

[lilyannerose]

It does not rise to our standard of evidence. It does not even rise to our standard of respectable propagada. It's propaganda of the shabbiest and crudest kind to promote perhaps the most damaging fantasy every prepetrated by men. That fact that you live your life by it and glorify it with a capital "g" does not improve our opinion of it. The fact that some people might actually live their lives by it is all the more reason for us to express in the clearest of terms what our view of it is.

I do not understand what is so shabby and crude about the evidence listed on that page. If you have proof that these facts, which verify events in the bible (therefore evidence for the reliability of the bible), are not true, then please share them.

Could it be that Laurence Gardner also uses the Sumerian Texts but comes up with an entirely different POV as his translation states that the events in these alleged Texts are from a previous Golden Age? I give Gardner the same level of credibility as I give organized religion. Whatever my POV, you still have the same texts with opposing points of view.

Next?