(October 19, 2015 at 10:22 am)Drich Wrote:
You can't/won't define bigot because to you it is just a mean name to call people when you strongly disagree with them, and if they were programmed by society properly they will take back what they said an fall in line. That is why someone like you will not define a word like bigot when asked.
However those looking for truth will always provide any truth they have when asked. Which was the reason why I've defined 'bigot' several times in this thread. for my usage of the word and to correct mindless social lemmings and their usage of the word.
Look here sport, A Bigot is not just an insult. It describes hate or intolerance a person has for someone who holds a different opinion. Now it is true that I have a different opinion, but I ask you to show me the hate in anything I have said.. Now remember me having a different opinion is not hate. it is simply a different opinion.
Now let's look for hate in what you have said.... Nothing?!!? Imagine that.
Now lets look at the hypocritical words of the pro gay loby.. (or what you and the pervious posted said.) hmmm.. Me loosing my faith because I take my instruction from the bible, would be an example of hate. calling me names (not using word terms properly/contextually) eg, homophobe, bigot, Hater of gay people, again without proper context the names/titles can all be construed as hate speech. as they are mean in a slanderous way, to defame my ideas and discredit me personally. So I ask then who is the bigot here? If you respect the truth at all, then you have to concede it is you. If you are not a fan of truth then you're a nobody I need to be concerned with.
What is the reason for this/your bigotry and hate? I simply don't agree with your world view. I say Homosexuality is a sin like all other sexual sin found in the NT. which again puts the homosexual on the same level as anyother brother or sister who has fallen into sexual sin. My call to repentance to the homosexual is no different than any other heterosexual caught in sexual sin. This is true equality sport. not bigotry. Me telling the homosexual he can justify his deeds before God, or me simply remaining silent is akin to me sending that person to Hell. Calling them to repent takes a rather large measure of brotherly love especially in today's society.
"a person who is intolerant towards those holding different opinions.
"don't let a few small-minded bigots destroy the good image of the city""
Done, now you can stop deflecting with long walls of text dedicated to relatively minor points. No need to thank me.
Another question I would ask, based on this definition, is that are you intolerant to the opinion that gay people have a right to be themselves without ridicule or any type of harassment?
I mean, you're declaring it a sin. You're saying God is going to send them to hell. You support God, you say hes right. About everything. Therefore you think its right for gay people to burn forever?
And you have the gall to feign offence at being called intolerant?
Just stop, its demonstrably false, demeaning and detracting from your main points.
(October 19, 2015 at 10:22 am)Drich Wrote: Gay people do not have a special in or reason to commit suicide. They commit suicide for the same reasons everyone else does. they are unhappy with themselves and think death is a release or end to their suffering. This is not unique to the gay community. If however given the social acceptance in recent years if gay suicide has not changed or has even increased then perhaps it is not the outside influences that contribute to gay suicide, but internal ones. (Something inherent with that life choice.)If a community targeted you by screaming abuse at you, calling you an abomination and saying you deserve to burn in hell regularly I dare say it might contribute slightly to you being "unhappy". Again, this is demeaning.
To deny that the regular abuse they suffer does not play a role undermines any credibility you have.
Its dishonest and you know it.
(October 19, 2015 at 10:22 am)Drich Wrote: You didn't even look at the link I provided to positive Christianity did you?
"Positive Christiianity" was Hitler's own version. Meaning He completely cut Himself and those in Germany off of the R/C Church and ALL other non state sponcered/propaganda filled bibles and denominations.
So yes Hitler did indeed use the term 'God' but as I said (Before you strawmanned off into this completely uninformed/ignorant of basic history tangent) Hitler saw the bible and Christianity as prescribed by the bible as a 'problem' to the Germany he was creating. He deemed all non Nazi State versions of Christianity is Negitive, and issued edicts forbidding it's practice. In His version he was the prophet/pope to God, and his word was akin to the words of God. This subsequently is why he also forbade Atheism.
If you have evidence important to your argument copy and paste the specific sentence or paragraph important to it. Nobody should have to search through a webpage to find your point for you.
Anyway. He was a leader of a different denomination so that means Christianity isn't responsible.
Seriously. When has that line of reasoning ever worked for you?
(October 19, 2015 at 10:22 am)Drich Wrote: Again, no. I ask you go back and read what I posted on "Positive Christianity." Educate yourself, before you speak. Don't make it so easy for me to make you look foolish. it makes everything you stand for also look ill informed and foolish.
So your house is pretty much just shards of glass at this point huh?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
