You can't prove a negative, that's just what it boils down to. Some might call that a victory for theists, but those people are stupid. It's a logical fallacy to say something is true because it cannot be disproved. Arguing any further than this is just giving your opponent far too much credit.
Brick-top's example wasn't well thought out. Just refer Russell's teapot for this argument. It's a well-known previously established hypothetical that does the trick.
Brick-top's example wasn't well thought out. Just refer Russell's teapot for this argument. It's a well-known previously established hypothetical that does the trick.
