Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Little Rik]

Holy Santa.
First you say............god falls under absence of evidence since since we can not proof his existence..............and then you state that.........The world can work without the existence of a god........

Oh, my God you really smash one more contradictory statement especially in the face of your mate Rob that just few minutes ago was preaching the lack of evidence into believing that God exist.
You just state something so you must have the evidence that the ....world can work without the existence of a god.

Oh, my God i am all shaken.  
If this is not a belief what is it?  

How is that a contradiction?

We have yet to see the involvement of a god or see the need for the involvement of a god.
If a god does exist then he is most likely not related to any of the religions on earth.

Don't you realize that you just made an unsubstantiated statement?
How would you know whether there is a God that control everything or the universe doesn't need a controller when in fact physical science has yet to answer this question?
You create a belief in your mind that the situation is such and such which come with no evidence of whatsoever therefore as such it become a dogma.

I am afraid Rob that the one who declare victory is Little Rik.
Now that your mate stated his belief that .........the world can work without the existence of a god.......which of course is an unfounded statement and belief Little Rik got the evidence that atheism is based on beliefs.      

Well then let me put it another way, there is no evidence that a god is needed for the world to work as of yet.
That would be my opinion, not belief.Unlike a belief, i can change my opinion (my opinion is that belief is part of the subconscious)

There is no physical evidence.
That doesn't mean that evidence can be found elsewhere.
In any case you did state that there is no need for a God without backing your statement with evidence.