21 U.S. states will not allow syrian refugees

[Wyrd of Gawd]

Pretty sure that if a sitting president was convicted by the Senate for something that is in fact, not a statutory crime (say, wearing mismatched socks), we would have at minimum an issue for SCOTUS to decide, if not an outright constitutional crisis.

I have no doubt SCOTUS would void any conviction based on the fact that no crime had been demonstrated. And more to the point, I have no doubt that the Congress, knowing that, would not dream of charging a President with a non-crime.

The SCOTUS can't reverse a presidential impeachment.  It has no jurisdiction in the matter other than the Chief Justice presides over it.  But once the Senate convicts it's a done deal.