Even if their logic was sound (spoiler alert: it's not) I don't see how it leads to monotheistic deism. Everything doesn't require a creator. Pretty much everything requires multiple creators. One person might have made a painting, but someone else made the paint and another the paintbrush. This argument seems more one for polytheism to me.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)