First, as i already said 2 or 3 times, this is not MY argument, it's an argument that theists use. So keep that in mind, im only being the Devil's advocate.
Some theories have not gone obsolete, but a lot have. So how can we trust the knowledge that we now have considering that knowledge is likely (likely meaning a probability, not a certainty) wrong ?
And to link that to theism: the science behind radiometric dating, evolution, the Big Bang, the expansion of the Universe, the origins of life, etc cannot be trusted since it is likely (again, emphasis on the "likely") to be proven false in time.
Some theories have not gone obsolete, but a lot have. So how can we trust the knowledge that we now have considering that knowledge is likely (likely meaning a probability, not a certainty) wrong ?
And to link that to theism: the science behind radiometric dating, evolution, the Big Bang, the expansion of the Universe, the origins of life, etc cannot be trusted since it is likely (again, emphasis on the "likely") to be proven false in time.
