(December 7, 2015 at 1:15 pm)orangebox21 Wrote:The question was if religion invokes a one-sided worldview and you responded with "What's substitutionary atonement"(December 6, 2015 at 3:14 am)Heat Wrote: What are you talking about?Your definition of substitutionary atonement.
I did not give you a description. I told you why the description of what that means doesn't have any relevance to this. You are attempting to claim, i presume, that because jesus died as substitute for others instead of them, that that is the least one sided you can get and I specifically explained how that has no relevance or weight on whether or not religion invokes one sided views unless you are claiming to be jesus, in which case no, that is not a one sided view.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
