The Moral Argument for God

[Joods]

You'll have to start by phrasing it as a valid syllogism, because that one is something like:

If !P then !Q
P
Therefore Q

Why is that formulation necessary as opposed to the formula commonly used with this argument?

---

The logic of the argument is not solid because if the three points you cited above can good enough proof of the existence of a god then I give you this:

1. If objective moral values and duties do not exist, then ironman does not exist.
2.Objective moral values and duties do exist.
3. Therefore, ironman exists.

This sounds good initially, but I wonder if all it does is shift the question to whether Ironman is a candidate for being god?

I think Iron man would make a good candidate for a god, but I think Odin may have an issue with that, especially since Thor is supposed to take over when Odin can no longer fullfill his role as a god. 

Yes, I know this is a serious subject, but I love being able to reference any Marvel character in posts, when it's appropriate. I'll go back to lurking now.