(December 8, 2015 at 1:56 am)Heat Wrote:
It seems rather ironic that you willingly select one religion but can't even muster up an ounce of intellectual honesty when critically analyzing it, always somewhat arriving to the conclusion of "Well it looks wrong, but trust me, it's right, I just haven't figured out why yet".
Actually now that I rethink it, it's not ironic moreover just purely stupid which is to be expected, the same logic applying to this as applied to god that "Well it looks wrong, but it's right, I know it has to be right, I just can't figure out a good reason why".
I don't think that it is a case of "Well it looks wrong, but it's right, I know it has to be right, I just can't figure out a good reason why". Where do you think, that I am being intellectually dishonest? Frankly, I got the reason I gave from the English translation (particularly the translation given in the OP), When I went to look it up for context in another version, it said "country", which I think "region" is a better translation (exactly because the word "country" may cause people lead people to assume restrictions which are not required in the original language.
However, if you would like to "wow" me with your critical analysis... feel free to do so.