KichigaiNeko Wrote:Rwandrall Wrote:BTW this isnt my point, but people who argue that use that argument.
Basically it means: how can we trust science when it will become obsolete over time anyways ? Is it the absolute truth if it is likely we'll find it silly in a few hundred years ?
Sounds like you are more afraid of being on the 'wrong team' than actually accepting that science is in a constant state of evolution .... as our knowledge grows we discard what is in error...
Why should this bother you??
I mean...i just dont know how many times i can state this, it's right there in the post that you quoted...
THIS IS NOT MY ARGUMENT.
This is an argument i FACE and i'm here to try and find rebuttals to it. I just don't see how this is not clear by now...