(December 6, 2015 at 8:33 pm)Mechaghostman2 Wrote: The problem with the prequels was there was almost no character development, the dialogue was annoying (emo Anikan anyone?) and the overall films were just kinda boring. We wanted to see a grand epic adventure of the David Vs. Goliath type, not people standing around talking, and talking, and talking about taxes, and Romeo & Juliet styled romances with a teenage angsty emo Jedi. Episode III was better than the first 2 because George cut back on his attempt at complex screen play and focused more on the action and over the top villains, and gave it a dark ending.
All good points, but the movies are designed as kids flicks really, and they don't need deep-and-meaningful character development. Adults hate Jar-Jar, but kids love him for example. And he's as basic as they come - he has a bland personality, doesn't learn anything, and is easily manipulated by others. But he's fun and entertaining for kids, and so are the droids. It's been pointed out by people before that humans wouldn't design sentient robots that can feel emotions and pain - because that's just silly - yet all through the originals they feel emotions (including fear), and 3PO says clearly he can experience pain as well. That's not something designed for an 'intelligent' adult audience, that's designed for kids. And when Yoda brought out his lightsabre in Episode II (or was it III?) he looked fucking stupid, but, kids again loved it.
You have to work out who you want to appease with your film. "The Mighty Ducks" for example, critics say its a terrible film - but I absolutely loved it as a kid, watched it again recently (on a VHS TV recording) and still loved it. Just look at how polarising the numbers are - 65% of general public audience said they liked it compared to just 15% of film critics. That's a huge difference, it's the difference between a good movie, and a fucking terrible movie.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke