(December 15, 2015 at 6:12 pm)Stimbo Wrote: If Richard Dawkins said 2+2= "God doesn't exist", you can bet your braincell I'd be tearing him apart as a biased source.
As a biased source or someone who is simply mistaken?
Listen, it's clear at this point you have no idea what you're talking about. Inventing bullshit reasons to discredit someone doesn't rule out the fact that what they're saying might be true.
It just exposes the intellectually dishonest charade that is atheism. When atheists can't attack arguments and evidence, they try and attack people instead.
Thankfully the attacks on people don't slide. Cato hasn't managed to substantiate a single claim he's made.
You claimed there is no evidence for God's existence. You've been provided two dozen of them. Now refute them!