Rayaan Wrote:I'll post what I said earlier, which is that the hadiths are not analogous to the Book of Acts because the many of the hadiths have been passed down with a sound chain of transmission, and they were narrated by many different people whose exact names and their relation to the Prophet (pbuh) are also recorded, and from a scholarly perspective, the Acts of the Apostles clearly does not have the same level of authenticity as the statements that are compiled in Sahih al-Bukhari. This means that the Acts of the Apostles are less reliable than the hadiths of Bukhari.
Are you joking? or are you just trolling?
