Convert me if you can

[annatar]

I think you are referring to the verses about the division of inheritance (again).

Yes. I am. And the reason why I am doing it is because it is a crucial mistake and you cant fix it without changing the rates given in quran.

You're telling me that I dont understand the principles of inheritance but you are not able to tell who understands or doesn't Because you admitted that you dont know that issue.
You said once that you are not familiar with this inharitage issue. And even if you don't know a shit about it you are defending it with sending me some links which I know you didn't even read..(you would see that they are not fixing that error but just changing the original rates of quran had you read!) That is nothing but a blind faith... And, If you think you can't understand quran without your imams interpretations, look these veses really carefully,

Yusuf, 1: Alif, Lam, Ra. These are the verses of the clear Book.
Al-hijr, 1: Alif, Lam, Ra. These are the verses of the Book and a clear Qur'an.
al-haj, 16: And thus have We sent the Qur'an down as verses of clear evidence and because Allah guides whom He intends.
......
....(there are a lot more like them)

So quran giving us clear instructions about the herritage and this instructions are imposible to use. Therefor, according to quran 1=1.125

There are different degrees of reliability. It's not a black and white thing. So, they can still be used as an argument for Islam if they have the slightest reliability.

Apart form their reliability which is none, you cant use a book to confirm itself. it is not an argument it is jus a fallacy. Telling that quran is right because quran says its right is not a valid argument. You need real evidence to prove your book. So quran+hadiths are not arguments..