(December 17, 2015 at 6:18 pm)Losty Wrote: I didn't read the whole thing but I've seen two posts by two people saying they're not accusing you of saying that. So I still think it looks like both sides arguing for no reason.
Well just so you don't think I'm going nuts, here is where they both make accusations:
(December 17, 2015 at 5:49 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: No, CL, I don't think you downplayed rape, I just thought you should know clearly that arousal is not consent, and how one should go about it if they ever decide to do anything kinky.
(December 17, 2015 at 9:19 am)Brian37 Wrote: Some morons think rape is strictly about a man getting a boner and enjoying the vaginal penetration.The "moron" he is referring to is me, btw.
So, as you can see, I'm being accused of thinking arousal = consent, and of thinking rape is only a vaginal penetration of male on female.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
