(December 21, 2015 at 2:58 am)Delicate Wrote: Well, I can't think of a single point he makes that is substantive with regards to religion.
But you can pick the best. Or most easily defended. Or most plausible. Or whichever you want.
I don't pay attention to any of his points. His books were not on the syllabus when I was in atheist school. Oh wait, I never even went to atheist school. Hope they don't rescind my license. Oh that's right, there is no licensing of any kind required to disbelieve other people's silly stuff.
How could there be a spokesperson for atheism? Is there a spokesperson for people who don't collect stamps? Another for people who aren't a fan of Julia Roberts?
Of course when the dominant religion keeps trying to foist its identity into the laws of the land one would expect those who object -those of other faiths or of no faith- to be drawn together in protest. I guess that is what you are on about you twit.
