(December 21, 2015 at 3:39 pm)Delicate Wrote:(December 21, 2015 at 3:32 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Are you capable of explaining Hume's principle, or are you just going to mock it with a non-sequitur butchered god reference, in hopes that we'll accept your ad hominem that Cato (!!) is not up to the task of presenting a cogent argument?
I don't think you're following the line of argument.
What's as yet unexplained is what problem Cato has with my argument, given that he can't express an objection.
You didn't present an argument. You presented a non-sequitur dismissal and an ad hominem attack. You were hoping that we wouldn't notice. But we could have predicted it, because nearly every post you have made since your first thread have just called atheists "stupid" for not agreeing with you. Whine, whine, whine, dismiss, dismiss, dismiss, deflect, deflect, deflect. That precious ego and your ridiculous monster of an imaginary friend really need protecting, don't they?? It's getting really old. Why don't you just go away, pat yourself on the back for "winning" all these arguments, and brag to your xtian cronies about how smart you are?
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
