Best Living Spokesman for Atheism

[drfuzzy]

Did you not understand my reference to Hume's guillotine? Or are you simply incapable of seeing its immediate applicability to the is/ought you established in your justice example? I thought the argument would be understood by someone that hurled a 'problem of induction' grenade in another conversation (the problem predates Hume of course, but his is the most famous and thorough treatment).

Not only did I succinctly express my objection, but simultaneously unveiled your ignorance notwithstanding your constant reminders of your intellectual superiority.

It's typical of people who are uninformed about issues, like you, to resort to empty sloganeering rather than demonstrating a real problem.

Unless you can clearly explain what the problem is (which you still haven't been able to, notice), I don't see a point.

Atheism may be built on empty sloganeering. But in the real world, you need substance.

You still didn't prove that you had any clue regarding what a brilliant logician was talking about.  More deflection.  More proof of your own ignorance and incompetence, spread out for the entire forum to see.  

That last sentence though, that's hilarious.  Someone who is trying to tell us that atheism is a religion, someone who keeps asserting that we believe in gawd despite being told a hundred times that we do not, accusing us of "sloganeering" and telling us that we need substance.  That's what we've been trying to tell you ad nauseum:  YOU NEED SUBSTANCE!!!!  Measurable, provable, verifiable substance.  Scientific proof.   

You come here with less than nothing, as you have now proved over a hundred times, and do nothing but brag about how much you know and insult us in our own house.  You're a troll.  And you're clearly not a xtian.  Put up or shut up.