(December 22, 2015 at 10:50 pm)Delicate Wrote:(December 21, 2015 at 8:26 pm)Cato Wrote: Did you not understand my reference to Hume's guillotine? Or are you simply incapable of seeing its immediate applicability to the is/ought you established in your justice example? I thought the argument would be understood by someone that hurled a 'problem of induction' grenade in another conversation (the problem predates Hume of course, but his is the most famous and thorough treatment).
Not only did I succinctly express my objection, but simultaneously unveiled your ignorance notwithstanding your constant reminders of your intellectual superiority.
It's typical of people who are uninformed about issues, like you, to resort to empty sloganeering rather than demonstrating a real problem.
Unless you can clearly explain what the problem is (which you still haven't been able to, notice), I don't see a point.
Atheism may be built on empty sloganeering. But in the real world, you need substance.
Theists have not managed to convince me that their idea of gods or god are true. That's it really.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
