My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument

[paulpablo]

The refutation has faulty reasoning.

If you disbelieve things because they go against the basis of science then why do you say it's obvious that a creator exists outside of space and time and creates things and does things but we can't understand.

It goes against science to just assume another dimension exists, that actions can be done outside of space and time.

I'd like to add that the point of the question is to show an infinite regression.  There's nothing wrong with the question who created God.

Basically this argument goes a bit like this

Man1) I can fly

Man2)how?

Man1) that question goes against science because the human body can't actually fly, what I'm obviously doing is going into another dimension, turning invisible, stopping time, then even though time is stopping I'm still moving because I'm in this other dimension that I can't prove exists.  This is how I managed to build the pryamids in ancient Egypt, either prove I definitely didn't do it or I'm right and I did do it.

You don't have wings

I agree.