My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument

[Cato]

How would you know that these elements can't have come from some source, very unlike a god?

The Standard Model gives a good account of how all the elements came to be. Our new friend should pay close attention to the word how. In addition to the severe lack of predictive capability, ID is silent when it comes to the how.

ID can in no way be considered science; it's literalism dressed up in an effort to pass it off as science. Most Christians don't even accept it. On that note, ID supporters like this guy and AAA would spend their time better convincing the rest of Christiandom, they at least already accept the central premise.