Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 3:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New vid: argument from ignorance explained through mining
#16
RE: New vid: argument from ignorance explained through mining
(December 30, 2015 at 4:05 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: To be honest, the most common logical fallacy I've seen on these forums is misapplication of logical fallacies to where there are none (which is a form of a straw man) by giving the sense the person is saying this and this which is a form of a fallacy.

Actually it's called the fallacy fallacy and yeah, it's definitely the most commonly used logical fallacy on this forum and probably on the internet. Learning about logical fallacies is fine but often times people will point out them in this sort of scenario:

Person A: Well Glen Beck is in favor of the Iraq war, and he's an idiot so I think the war is bad.
Person B: That's a logical fallacy: ad hominem!

Ironically just calling someone out on a logical fallacy and not attempting to address their root idea (in the example you would still have to prove that the war is good) is the fallacy fallacy. It's frequently an attempt to kill the discussion and smugly feel intellectually superior to the other person without actually having to present any ideas. There have been some people on these forums who were terrible about this. Back when DeistPaladin posted he would scan every post that he disagreed with for anything that might be a logical fallacy and then point them out, but very rarely address the actual point. There are lots of other people who do it to a lesser degree too. Again the irony is that by lazily pointing out logical fallacies the person is committing one. That's why even when someone annoyingly strawman's me or something I don't say 'Strawman!!! Wah wah waaah" Instead I would say something like 'you are misrepresenting what was saying, here is what I actually meant' That pushes the discussion forward, most of the time crying logical fallacy is more of an end to a discussion that upsets the other person and degenerates to name calling.

It's also important to note that just because someone uses logical fallacies doesn't make them wrong nor does being careful about not using them make someone right.
[Image: dcep7c.jpg]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: New vid: argument from ignorance explained through mining - by CapnAwesome - December 30, 2015 at 5:20 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Islam - the Peaceful Religion: Explained Darwins Disciple 31 4331 August 26, 2018 at 11:28 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Proof of Jesus through Personal testimony. Christianity over other faiths orthodox-man 46 9653 January 29, 2018 at 10:05 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  How has the church lost power through time? Macoleco 10 1289 September 28, 2017 at 8:46 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  New Darkmatter vid: indoctrination and reinforcement robvalue 14 2751 February 25, 2016 at 11:23 am
Last Post: Drich
  "I can't see the wishom behind babies dying from cancer" is argument from ignorance ReptilianPeon 16 4690 December 7, 2015 at 1:06 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Big bang & God explained ! reality.Mathematician 3 1364 June 19, 2014 at 3:19 am
Last Post: ShaMan
  Evolution, religion, and ignorance. Esquilax 341 90760 May 24, 2014 at 6:18 pm
Last Post: Chas
  Everything explained. There is a God - bugger! max-greece 13 4671 June 6, 2013 at 2:02 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  new thread for old RE: Atheists, what do you believe is the best argument for the existence of a deity? Mark 13:13 65 21545 January 23, 2013 at 9:03 pm
Last Post: ThomM
  Faith Through Fear NoFate 49 21173 July 6, 2012 at 6:44 am
Last Post: CliveStaples



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)