(January 15, 2016 at 9:00 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: I wanted to vote that too, but I think it isn't quite like that. More like his dedication to the cause makes him gloss over and obscure whatever doesn't further his cause. I doubt that he thinks of what he does as cold calculating lies. I don't have any use for the guy. He is a total tool.
I voted for #1 because he uses the same presentation, the same lecture, the same format, etc., over and over. He has been corrected in his use of the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem, even by prominent cosmologists (such as Sean Carroll) who personally know those researchers, and yet, Craig continues to trot out the same old nonsense time and time again. And, why? Because, he has nothing else to present, and his gullible, paying audiences continue to soak-up the same old crap. He's making a good living, that's for sure!
