RE: What do you think of William Lane Craig?
January 16, 2016 at 3:59 pm
(This post was last modified: January 16, 2016 at 4:00 pm by GrandizerII.)
(January 16, 2016 at 12:56 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(January 15, 2016 at 9:31 pm)Evie Wrote: Where's the "manipulative disingenuous cunt" option?
Sam Harris kicked his ass in debate. Sam Harris kicks ass just by waking up being Sam Harris though.
It's best with stupid fucking cunt of a bastard William Lane omitted and removed altogether:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8FRqMK8OOY
Bliss. Just Sam.
I think I haz a mancrush on Sam Harris, he is just so damn epic!
I watched the debate in its entirety, all 2 hours, 6 minutes, 54 seconds of it. Craig's argument basically is that if the Christian god "says that it is good, well, then it's good." A stunning moment happened near the end of the "show" (to quote the moderator), when one of the ND students claimed to have had a "vision from Jesus" the night before, and Craig dismissed him out-of-hand as a conscious fake. Today's "conscious fake" is tomorrow's "near visionary," I suppose. The most telling difference between Harris and Craig is that the latter thinks that ISIS is wrong because they are worshiping the "wrong god." Harris thinks that "they are wrong, period."
An interesting debate; I give the win to Craig on style but the win for substance goes to Harris, clearly.
The only debate I've seen Craig lose on style is this one:
