"But the same criticism can in a sense be levelled at Christopher's own 300 year old enlightenment perspective which I would argue equally offers insufficient explanatory power in a world of multiple developmental worldviews,..."
What does this even mean? You are attempting to jettison a rather successful broad range of ideas without argument for what appears to be nothing more than a "can't we all just get along" plea. Unless I missed something you have failed to address why enlightenment principles are outdated (all of them with your broad brush) or suggest an alternative.
What does this even mean? You are attempting to jettison a rather successful broad range of ideas without argument for what appears to be nothing more than a "can't we all just get along" plea. Unless I missed something you have failed to address why enlightenment principles are outdated (all of them with your broad brush) or suggest an alternative.
