Well Hi everybody!
You all know damn well ol' Dotard was going to show up in here voting 'against' and joining IB in some sort of baseless diatribe against homofags.
Guess again. I find myself unable to vote. If the poll would have been "Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion?", if you are a pro-choicer "Pro-Abortionist" is a bit misleading. It is the CHOICE you are pro for, not the abortions themselves.
I thinks if a couple of homos wished to put on paper their 'union' or partnership then the state should be bound to reconize it as a basis for shared insurance, death benifits etc. etc. If this is possible, why do gays place so much importance on having it reconized as a traditional 'marriage'?
It is of my opinion the push for 'marriage' is an attempt to normalize an abnormality.
You all know damn well ol' Dotard was going to show up in here voting 'against' and joining IB in some sort of baseless diatribe against homofags.
Guess again. I find myself unable to vote. If the poll would have been "Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Abortion?", if you are a pro-choicer "Pro-Abortionist" is a bit misleading. It is the CHOICE you are pro for, not the abortions themselves.
I thinks if a couple of homos wished to put on paper their 'union' or partnership then the state should be bound to reconize it as a basis for shared insurance, death benifits etc. etc. If this is possible, why do gays place so much importance on having it reconized as a traditional 'marriage'?
It is of my opinion the push for 'marriage' is an attempt to normalize an abnormality.
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
![[Image: attemptingtogiveadamnc.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img824.imageshack.us%2Fimg824%2F7042%2Fattemptingtogiveadamnc.gif)
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
