(February 21, 2011 at 12:15 pm)8BitAtheist Wrote: I'm not the smartest person in the world so maybe I'm missing something. I don't quite understand all this talk of natural vs the unnatural. We exist, and that's natural and we develop and think and grow up to use science, sometimes there are medical breakthroughs, some would argue that curing disease would be "unnatural" but I don't believe in Natural. If I had to believe in the Natural I'd say that everything is and the only way to differentiate things would be to label them as "The common" and "The uncommon" but to say that the "uncommon is unnatural" is an absurd view point in my opinion.
Also on sexuality I've never kissed a man but I've never ruled out kissing a man. I don't like the terms straight-bi-gay but I've come to use them in a society that can't help but to discern people based on their sexuality. So in all likely hood I could be labeled as Bi-sexual but I believe that anyone could be labeled as such given the right circumstance. Sexuality is not as simple as "I like men" or "I like woman" because a lot of times it's being repressed.
---
Sorry for this incoherent rant. I've had no caffeine and I have a migraine to boot.
The term for that particular point of view, which i share is Pomosexual(as in post-modernist sexual)
