RE: Gay Marriage - are you for or against it and why?
February 21, 2011 at 5:33 pm
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2011 at 8:23 pm by Dotard.)
(February 21, 2011 at 11:16 am)Ashendant Wrote: That's kinda my point, to me there are no such labels as homosexuality, heterosexuality and bisexuality, just sexuality,...
Sorry. You can't wish away existing labels. There are homosexuals, bi-sexuals and heterosexuals. I'm sure there exists chickensexuals, mudsexuals and electricaloutletsexuals to name a few. The first three are identified in the scientific communities and excepted by the majority of people. They exist. You are the first person who I ever heard deny their existance.
Quote:I accept to this statement
In 1995, Harvard Shakespeare professor Marjorie Garber made the academic case for bisexuality with her Vice Versa: Bisexuality and the Eroticism of Everyday Life, in which she argued that most people would be bisexual if not for "repression, religion, repugnance, denial, laziness, shyness, lack of opportunity, premature specialization, a failure of imagination, or a life already full to the brim with erotic experiences, albeit with only one person, or only one gender."[12]
And I'm sure I just may have been a homosexual if not for the existance of pussy. Or knotholes, or chickens. Nah, maybe not. Now that I think about it, I'd be a knotholesexual or chickensexual before homosexuality. But that's just me.
Oh.... what was the point of posting that?
EDIT: i also found the proof i was looking for
Quote:Dr. Alfred Kinsey's 1948 work Sexual Behavior in the Human Male found that "46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or 'reacted to' persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives".[15]
Quote:The Janus Report on Sexual Behavior, published in 1993, showed that 5 percent of men and 3 percent of women consider themselves bisexual and 4 percent of men and 2 percent of women considered themselves homosexual.[14]What changed between 1948 and 1993, the media view on it
[/quote]
Nope. I'd say it was the quality of the experiments. Maybe the first was held in San Fransico. Or maybe their selection of participants was all of 20 dudes in the "male bath-houses" of that day. It says 46% of the male population". Population where? And really, he asked every single male from the entire populace?
Most likely a much better quality report.
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
![[Image: attemptingtogiveadamnc.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img824.imageshack.us%2Fimg824%2F7042%2Fattemptingtogiveadamnc.gif)